GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation — 60 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.8k
c/retatrutide·submitted 1 year ago by u/nabila_bakken

[Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation

Questionbranch of 11 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: glucagon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 23 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same…

Read the full submission and all 60 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 1 year ago
u/bilal_osei294 points·1 year ago

the 0.5mg arm is different from 2.4mg, results do not transfer

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_asante84 points·1 year ago

Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?

replysharereportpermalink
u/nabila_bakkenOP55 points·1 year ago

the 15mg arm is different from 12.5mg, results do not transfer

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram_only46 points·1 year ago

the 5mg arm is different from 7.5mg, results do not transfer

replysharereportpermalink
u/nabila_bakkenOP153 points·1 year ago

The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken82 points·1 year ago

the dosing is steep, the constipation reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet

replysharereportpermalink
u/nausea_notesside effects51 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

replysharereportpermalink
u/deleted_my_history27 points·1 year ago

Small correction: the trial was 16 weeks, not 11. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_lindholm40 points·1 year ago

This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/devils_advocate_d20 points·1 year ago

retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyeman103 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.