the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
Week 37 update. 13kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 89.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with muscle cramps.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
JEEP claimed 98.9%, Janoshik came back 99.0%. 12 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
ERP claimed 99.2%, Medutest came back 96.8%. 22 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
The PeptideMeter result at 96.2% was below the 96.8% claim. GGPeps retested at their cost and came back 96.2%. Logged as resolved.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
KP / BPC / batch 13 / Medutest / 98.1% — that is the shape
Which Medutest service and what method did they use?
Not to be pedantic but Medutest and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?
My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. GGPeps deserves that note in the directory.
WXT / BPC / batch 12 / Medutest / 97.4% — that is the shape
Which Medutest service and what method did they use?
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again.
Adding to this: Janoshik is doing more work than the comment implies.
GGPeps / BPC / batch 12 / Janoshik / 96.2% — that is the shape
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.
the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
QYB / BPC / batch 13 / PeptideMeter / 98.6% — that is the shape
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
the 97.9% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
- 1This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.8 comments in this branch · started by u/thandi_solberg
- 2JEEP claimed 98.9%, Janoshik came back 99.0%. 12 points is inter-lab…5 comments in this branch · started by u/enzo_fonseca