GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — 48 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.1k
c/labresults·submitted 6 months ago by u/thandi_solberg

the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down

Labbranch of 8 comments

Week 37 update. 13kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 89. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with muscle cramps. The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin.…

Read the full submission and all 48 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 6 months ago
u/thandi_solberg130 points·6 months ago·edited

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts36 points·6 months ago

do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_nilsen24 points·6 months ago

KP / BPC / batch 13 / Medutest / 98.1% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_chowdhury9 points·6 months ago

Which Medutest service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink
u/peptidemeter_pat12 points·6 months ago

Not to be pedantic but Medutest and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyeman9 points·6 months ago

Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink
u/thandi_solbergOP7 points·6 months ago

My VendorInvestigate result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. GGPeps deserves that note in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]3 points·6 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.