[Discussion] the trials under-powered every question in this community
Right, the fertility question again, but with numbers this time. I have 22 data points over 32 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the cycle tracking data matters, keep it private
Slight fix: the number was 98.6, not 98.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
cycle changes are real and under-researched