stalled for 17 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time
area percent. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/darkspot is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort area percent out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 23 months. My…
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.