[Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Week 27 update. 43kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 79.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
Sent one vial to Medutest and PeptideMeter. 98.3% and 98.4%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
the batch number or it did not happen
the batch number or it did not happen
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
Batch number and date of analysis?
Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
- 1the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing12 comments in this branch · started by u/alcohol_aversion
- 2Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.6 comments in this branch · started by u/tomas_lehtinen