GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 62 comments in the full submission. View in context.
6.1k
c/coa·submitted 1 year ago by u/teodor_lokken

[Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Labbranch of 6 comments

Week 27 update. 43kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 79. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux. The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering,…

Read the full submission and all 62 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/tomas_lehtinen183 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rania_okonkwo56 points·1 year ago·edited

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_danquah149 points·1 year ago

post the whole document, not the headline number

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox29126 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_frisk96 points·1 year ago

no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_trevino75 points·1 year ago

Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/coa

How to read a certificate of analysis and what it does and does not tell you. Area% versus mass%, identity versus quantity, water content, related substances, acetate counterions, and the difference between a vendor-supplied COA and an independent test on the vial you actually received.

71kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/coa rules
  1. Post the full document. Cropped COAs that hide the batch number or date get removed.
  2. Redact your own name and order id, not the vendor's batch details.
  3. No "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.