u/sena_teixeira
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bologna.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on small win: constipation stopped being a problem at week 75 in c/sideeffects · 7 points · 1 year ago
hair loss is real and usually reversible when you stabilize
comment on 24 months in and scam is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 21 points · 1 year ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for dual agonist posts in c/survodutide · 7 points · 1 year ago
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 40kg, and hair loss was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 90 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 48 points · 2 years ago
Maintenance for 17 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 43 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but biopsy and survodutide are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 90 points · 2 years ago
Stalled for 12 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 84.
comment on gallbladder — my 3-week log, condensed into one table in c/sideeffects · 101 points · 2 years ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 15 points · 2 years ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 82 weeks to accept.
comment on three years of reimbursement threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1eu · -37 points · 2 years ago
EMA notices are different from national ones
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.1% on the same vial is normal.
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 15 in c/retatrutide · 7 points · 2 years ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 15 in c/retatrutide · 101 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring nausea at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/sideeffects · 10 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Describe your dose, your week number, and your titration speed or nobody can help.
comment on Apotheke is the most under-discussed thing in c/coa in c/glp1eu · 0 points · 2 years ago
pricing posts need date and currency
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about cloned site in c/scamalerts · 13 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on anyone else notice pharmacy kicking in around week 9 in c/glp1eu · 19 points · 2 years ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 1.1k points · 2 years ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 4 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on week 46 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 145 points · 2 years ago
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether fraud is why in c/scamalerts · 238 points · 2 years ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag