u/nayeli_fonseca

SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

reimbursement reality differs sharply

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

prescription costs in the UK this month

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

the community is deliberately image-free

The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.

appetite return timelines vary appetite return

tapering instructions are not welcome here

Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.

Yeah, text-only removes the comparison.

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix