u/nadia_fonseca
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rijeka.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on 20 months in and half-life is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 1 points · 9 months ago
more of this energy please
Adding to this: half-life is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] the related substances advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 128 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on what changed for me between week 45 and week 88 in c/coa · 219 points · 9 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on reading half-life threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1science · -15 points · 11 months ago
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/compounding · 162 points · 11 months ago
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about related substances in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
comment on appetite: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 20 points · 1 year ago
gastric emptying is real and explains most early constipation
comment on appetite: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 102 points · 1 year ago
rodent incretin tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Meta] the state board rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · 12 points · 1 year ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on what changed for me between week 35 and week 84 in c/glp1science · 1 points · 1 year ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on three years of pharmacology threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · 19 points · 1 year ago
gastric emptying is real and explains most early early fullness
comment on related substances is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 44 weeks to accept.
comment on batch vs related substances — genuinely asking which matters more in c/coa · 8 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on tried cagrilintide for 8 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 19 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 9 weeks, not 33. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on certificate of analysis: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/coa · 127 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on three years of 503A threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/compounding · 153 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on why does nobody talk about related substances in c/coa · 5 points · 1 year ago
the related substances line is where the story is
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 15kg, and API source was the hard part in c/compounding · 27 points · 1 year ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring certificate of analysis at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 43 points · 1 year ago
Asked HJ for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 26kg, and mechanism was the hard part in c/glp1science · 49 points · 1 year ago
mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation