u/laila_yilmaz

Is that fasted?

the MASH indication changes the risk calculus

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.9% on the same vial is normal.

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

week 48 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema

stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes

rudeness is removed faster than bad questions

The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash.

Adding to this: batch is doing more work than the comment implies.

post the whole document, not the headline number

what is titration — it means going slow on the escalation

ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first

Zepbound and Mounjaro are literally the same drug, the name is the only difference

Which trial arm?

redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

post the whole document, not the headline number

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.