u/laila_yilmaz
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Medellín.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on glucagon — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/survodutide · 61 points · 2 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on reading bloodwork threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bloodwork · 18 points · 2 months ago
the 7 month baseline labs check is the routine
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for first time posts in c/newbiequestions · 7 points · 2 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 13 points · 2 months ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on baseline labs — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/bloodwork · 108 points · 2 months ago
eGFR noise on rapid loss is real. 10 week noise, 22 week trend. Do not panic at week 86.
comment on [Meta] the survodutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/survodutide · 10 points · 2 months ago
Which trial arm?
comment on [Meta] the survodutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/survodutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Stalled for 3 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 26.
comment on [Meta] the survodutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/survodutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is hepatic fat, different from GIP/GLP-1
comment on the beginner question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 2 months ago
pens versus vials, same molecule, different price
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on fake COA in c/scamalerts · 14 points · 2 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Meta] the Zepbound rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/tirzepatide · -26 points · 2 months ago
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
comment on [Discussion] GIP is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 2 months ago
nope, the equivalence to semaglutide is not known, comparing 15mg tirz to 2.4mg sema is guessing
comment on [Discussion] GIP is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/tirzepatide · 0 points · 2 months ago
My fasting insulin moved faster on tirz than on sema at the same timepoint, which matches what people report.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about certificate of analysis in c/coa · 16 points · 3 months ago
Did they give you the chromatogram or just the summary line?
comment on small win: exit scam stopped being a problem at week 56 in c/scamalerts · 35 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on help me understand fake COA, I have read the wiki twice in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 21kg, and purity was the hard part in c/coa · 1 points · 3 months ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on tried tirzepatide for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tirzepatide · 46 points · 3 months ago
Not to be pedantic but 15mg and Mounjaro are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on reading exit scam threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 4 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on unpopular opinion: exit scam is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 20 points · 4 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds