u/joaquin_ivaturi
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bochum.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on BPC-157 — my 4-week log, condensed into one table in c/bpc157 · 146 points · 1 year ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on the disclosure thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/meta · 1 points · 1 year ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on the disclosure thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/meta · 5 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
comment on why does nobody talk about regulatory in c/bpc157 · 291 points · 1 year ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on week 51 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/meta · 2 points · 2 years ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 745 points · 2 years ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on [Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/meta · 3 points · 2 years ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · -34 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on 19 months in and hepatic fat is still the thing I get wrong in c/survodutide · 9 points · 2 years ago
Phase 19 or 32?
comment on [Question] glucagon — what am I missing here in c/survodutide · 209 points · 2 years ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify water content in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 2 points · 2 years ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 2 years ago
The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 93.7% but QSC claimed 95.1%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 0.5mg and the muscle cramps got better, not worse in c/coa · 114 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about meta until somebody posts a number in c/meta · 17 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Modmail first.
comment on am I the only one who found disclosure harder than the injections in c/meta · 53 points · 2 years ago
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?