BPC-157 — my 4-week log, condensed into one table
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/vendorvetting repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 24 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Stalled for 11 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 85.
[removed by moderator]
[removed by moderator]
Adding to this: rodent data is doing more work than the comment implies.
How many weeks between the two measurements?
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
pentadecapeptide is pentadecapeptide, the supply chain naming is a mess
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
What was the batch number and which service?
- 1Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.5 comments in this branch · started by u/cormac_roos