[Meta] proposal — a flair for BPC-157 posts
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 18 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Week 12 for me and the honest summary is: 8kg down, fatigue manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
How many weeks between the two measurements?
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
What was the batch number and which service?
- 1This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.5 comments in this branch · started by u/elodie_yilmaz