is it normal to get sulphur burps at week 34
Right, the pentadecapeptide question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 11 data points over 38 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 92, not week 46. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
[removed by moderator]
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
Crossposting this to c/vendorvetting because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Second this question. I have wondered about pentadecapeptide for 13 months and never seen a straight answer.
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
the sequence variation is the real issue
the sequence variation is the real issue
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
the sequence variation is the real issue
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
BPC regulatory is a naming problem, three things are called this
Not to be pedantic but tendon and BPC-157 are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
- 1Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.11 comments in this branch · started by u/aurel_boateng
- 2Second this question. I have wondered about pentadecapeptide for 13 months…8 comments in this branch · started by u/neha_rahimi