1.7k
[PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight.
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on lane in this community changed substantially around the start of last year,…
u/karim_hartmann
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Adana.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
8,610post karma
3,892comment karma
6submissions
71comments
comment on [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade in c/bpc157 · 2 points · 2 days ago
pentadecapeptide is regulatory, the supply chain naming is a mess
comment on [Lab] three BPC vials, three vendors, purity all over the place in c/bpc157 · 9 points · 3 days ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on [PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight. in c/intlshipping · -13 points · 4 days ago
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, actual transit days
comment on [Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably in c/cryptopay · -15 points · 4 days ago
Not to be pedantic but gas fees and crypto are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight. in c/intlshipping · 96 points · 4 days ago
Customs held the package for 23 days. No problems, just time. Factor it into expectations.
comment on [Question] does carrier choice matter more than origin city in c/intlshipping · 16 points · 4 days ago
the VendorInvestigate number or it did not happen
Adding to this: EMS is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight. in c/intlshipping · 9 points · 5 days ago
This is correct. Variance is the story.
comment on the mean transit time is useless, the 90th percentile is what melts your pack in c/intlshipping · 12 points · 8 days ago
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
comment on [Lab] identity confirmed but net peptide content was 71% in c/bpc157 · 9 points · 16 days ago
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 27 points · 17 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 49 points · 18 days ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring confirmations at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 19 points · 23 days ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on tried carrier for 4 weeks. here is what happened. in c/intlshipping · 1 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, the lane data is more useful than single reports.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 1 months ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on [Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/cryptopay · -18 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on three years of EMS threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/intlshipping · 18 points · 1 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/bpc157 · 2 points · 2 months ago
BPC regulatory is a naming problem, three things are called this
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 15kg, and chargeback was the hard part in c/cryptopay · 13 points · 2 months ago
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 93 points · 3 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.