three years of pentadecapeptide threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Right, the pentadecapeptide question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 7 data points over 12 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 9, not week 58. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Maintenance for 10 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
Stalled for 15 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 28.
Second this question. I have wondered about tendon for 19 months and never seen a straight answer.
What was the batch number and which service?
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
regulatory status changed in 9 countries, check yours
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Did anything else change in the same window?
[removed by moderator]
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the sequence variation is the real issue
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
regulatory status changed in 17 countries, check yours
The injection-site soreness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.
Adding to this: rodent data is doing more work than the comment implies.
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
- 1Second this question. I have wondered about tendon for 19 months and never…9 comments in this branch · started by u/chain_confirm_c
- 2Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different…6 comments in this branch · started by u/honest_syringe24