257
[Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no)
Quick one. Canada here. moderation works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given…
u/hamza_weiss
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Konya.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
5,500post karma
11,794comment karma
10submissions
142comments
comment on [Readout] SELECT: MACE HR 0.80, and the absolute numbers people skip in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 3 days ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on [Country Guide] personal import rules, my country, with the actual citations in c/customs · 92 points · 3 days ago
the UK here.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Method] the gradient everyone uses for sema and why it under-resolves the des-amido in c/hplc · 2 points · 4 days ago
Small correction: the trial was 24 weeks, not 7. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Failure] gel pack arrived liquid and warm. photos at unboxing. in c/coldchain · 9 points · 4 days ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 2 points · 4 days ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 11 points · 5 days ago
Came off after 43 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 2 points · 5 days ago
Not to be pedantic but wiki and ranking are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Question] why is the sequence written four different ways across vendors in c/bpc157 · 0 points · 6 days ago
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
comment on [CGM] my dawn phenomenon barely changed and that surprised me in c/t2dglp1 · 6 points · 7 days ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on [CGM] my dawn phenomenon barely changed and that surprised me in c/t2dglp1 · 2 points · 7 days ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
comment on two labs, same vial, 98.1 and 96.4. both right? in c/hplc · 33 points · 7 days ago
Yeah, the chromatogram profile matters more than the headline number.
comment on the food noise going quiet is the part nobody warned me about in c/semaglutide · 23 points · 7 days ago
my eGFR moved before the scale did and i nearly missed it
0
[Results] came off insulin entirely and i still check twice a day
Quick one. Canada here. CGM works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that…
comment on [Denied] employer carve-out was in the plan document, not the summary in c/insurancefights · -17 points · 8 days ago
four days. it took four days for me.
comment on [Discussion] non-peptide agonism is a genuinely different engineering problem in c/orforglipron · 13 points · 12 days ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Template] the three sentences that got my prior auth through in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 13 days ago
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
comment on [Discussion] denial reason codes decoded, mostly fixable paperwork in c/insurancefights · 0 points · 16 days ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about T2D until somebody posts a number in c/t2dglp1 · 7 points · 17 days ago
hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with metformin
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] should c/progresspics stay text-only forever (yes) in c/meta · 0 points · 19 days ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.