GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
0
c/meta·posted 2 years ago by u/wanjiru_osei

week 51 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me

Meta

Week 4 update. 25kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 56.

Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux.

The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.

Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.

0 up / 0 down42% upvoted7 commentsid aiprtr9 Jul 2024

7 comments

7 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/blunt_coldbox294 points·2 years ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with wiki, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emeka_chowdhury3 points·2 years ago
search before post, but also, welcome
replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_danquah2 points·2 years ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi2 points·2 years ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_diallo1 point·2 years ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 74 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dizzy_on_standing3 points·2 years ago

What are you comparing it against though?

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_duarte1 point·2 years ago

Second this question. I have wondered about moderation for 20 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.