GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
838
c/meta·posted 2 years ago by u/ewan_marchand

[Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussion Clean Column ×5

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.

Setup: 1.0mg, week 95, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — disclosure — and tracked it for 22 weeks.

Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.

Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.

7,363 up / 6,525 down53% upvoted60 commentsid aspdiq13 Apr 2024

60 comments

25 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/zeynep_duarte131 points·2 years ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_ambulatoryMOD100 points·2 years ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/injection_site_iris0 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcik70 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_trevino49 points·2 years ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_ibarra13 points·2 years ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_karlsen29 points·2 years ago·edited

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_moreau14 points·2 years ago·edited

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_marchetti7 points·2 years ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/prior_auth_painappeals0 points·2 years ago

This is correct.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 89 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_marchand18 points·2 years ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken-28 points·2 years ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik6 points·2 years ago

moderation appeals go through modmail first

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_ibarra25 points·2 years ago

The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_202412 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_boateng15 points·2 years ago

Crossposting this to c/cryptopay because the people who need it are not reading this community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arto_fonseca11 points·2 years ago

the disclosure question is policy, not individual

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi3 points·2 years ago

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_mbeki1 point·2 years ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/analog_alphabet1 point·2 years ago·edited

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/prior_auth_painappeals1 point·2 years ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/ice_pack_auditcold chain1 point·2 years ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers1 point·2 years ago

the evidence standards are disclosure

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]11 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_ferreira9 points·2 years ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.