GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
GU

u/gustav_vermeulen

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Angers.

member · joined 17 Aug 2025

9,875post karma
8,685comment karma
6submissions
91comments

Overview — page 5 of 5

comment on gastric emptying — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 7 points · 2 years ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

permalink

comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 659 points · 2 years ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

permalink

comment on [Lab] 13th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/tirzepatide · 36 points · 2 years ago

dual agonism is dual agonist, do not generalise from semaglutide

permalink

comment on genuine question about receptor that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 21 points · 2 years ago

receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere

permalink

comment on [Discussion] dual agonist is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/tirzepatide · 216 points · 2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

permalink

comment on my ferritin moved and I cannot work out whether appetite is why in c/glp1science · 103 points · 2 years ago

incretin physiology is mechanism, the mechanism layer

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 61 points · 2 years ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 110 points · 2 years ago

ERP took 22 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 86 points · 2 years ago

Ordered from SSA, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.

permalink

comment on small win: step therapy stopped being a problem at week 35 in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 2 years ago

Did you get step therapy or outright denial?

Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

permalink

comment on stalled for 6 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 2 years ago

say which country and which plan type

permalink

comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Zepbound at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 55 points · 2 years ago

Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.

permalink

comment on help me understand vendor, I have read the wiki twice in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago

Which service tested it and what did they come back with?

permalink

comment on [Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/coldchain · 412 points · 2 years ago

no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

permalink

comment on [Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/vendorvetting · 44 points · 2 years ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

permalink

Trophy case

No trophies yet. Most accounts here never get one.

Cake day 17 Aug 2025
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.