GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.1k
c/vendorvetting·posted 2 years ago by u/camila_sandvik

help me understand vendor, I have read the wiki twice

Lab Sourced ×6 Slow Clap ×2

Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 14 data points over 18 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 91, not week 45. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

1,614 up / 498 down76% upvoted55 commentsid 1gp2i330 Oct 2023

55 comments

19 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/fibre_forward252 points·2 years ago

Reship experience: Homopeptide asked for photos, processed it in 13 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nordic_pricing175 points·2 years ago

How many orders from TFC is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_ekstrom134 points·2 years ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution63 points·2 years ago·edited

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nz_unfunded49 points·2 years ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida-29 points·2 years ago

HJ order #24, Denmark, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinski1 point·2 years ago·edited

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen1 point·2 years ago

Which service tested it and what did they come back with?

replysharereportpermalink
u/zofia_lindholm142 points·2 years ago

the reship rate on MKM is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertieMOD81 points·2 years ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvikOP0 points·2 years ago

Yeah, WXT took 6 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida59 points·2 years ago

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_titration80 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvikOP45 points·2 years ago

How many orders from WWB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvikOP25 points·2 years ago

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_count_stan12 points·2 years ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/denied_again_d11 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 95.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard96 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_vanhecke59 points·2 years ago

the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →