[Discussion] the data logger advice in here is 6 years out of date
Right, the ice pack question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 5 data points over 38 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 73, not week 27. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Do you have the logger trace?
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
[deleted]
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
lyophilised powder is far more forgiving than reconstituted solution
Reconstituted or dry powder?
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
gel packs last 18 hours, after that you are relying on the box itself
- 1Do you have the logger trace?6 comments in this branch · started by u/honest_syringe33