reading Janoshik threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/maintenancephase repeats that order records is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 5 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the reship rate on JEEP is actually pretty consistent
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Not to be pedantic but VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
How many orders from CPC is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
HJ three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.7% anyway, so no harm done.
QSC took 10 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
the reship rate on QSC is actually pretty consistent
The Janoshik and Medutest numbers on the same vial from SWB came back 97.6% and 97.9%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
the reship rate on ERP is actually pretty consistent
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Reship experience: JEEP asked for photos, processed it in 21 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Cosigning the evidence standard.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
- 1HJ three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure.…6 comments in this branch · started by u/lina_almeida
- 2the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute…5 comments in this branch · started by u/ipamorelin_i