reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 10mg to 2.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 12 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have early fullness I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 50 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
Adding to this: testing is doing more work than the comment implies.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 89 weeks to accept.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
QYB order #14, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
Yeah, QSC took 7 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
CPC order #21, Spain, no drama, receipts inside
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
- 1Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.8 comments in this branch · started by u/zeynep_villalobos
- 2one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread5 comments in this branch · started by u/freya_onwuka