the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking PeptideMeter against triglycerides for 11 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was GGPeps.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
[removed by moderator]
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Small correction: the trial was 8 weeks, not 15. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
BCH took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Crossposting this to c/tirzepatide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
This order history matches mine almost exactly.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Homopeptide order #2, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
Small correction: the trial was 6 weeks, not 36. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent
Is that a Medutest result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…9 comments in this branch · started by u/kaia_cabrera
- 2Crossposting this to c/tirzepatide because the people who need it are not…8 comments in this branch · started by u/noor_cardoso