GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 69 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.6k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 10 months ago by u/paper_trail_paula

the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Vendorbranch of 9 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking PeptideMeter against triglycerides for 11 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one…

Read the full submission and all 69 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 10 months ago
u/kaia_cabrera295 points·10 months ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/paper_trail_paulaOPvetting234 points·10 months ago·edited

BCH took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ghrp_history173 points·10 months ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/amara_haddad136 points·10 months ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution38 points·10 months ago

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida45 points·10 months ago

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink
u/paper_trail_paulaOPvetting34 points·10 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thermal_mass_tom105 points·10 months ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/denied_again_d85 points·10 months ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.