switched from 0.5mg to 0.25mg and the nausea got better, not worse
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.25mg, week 79, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 6 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
How many orders from FGP is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
the batch number or it did not happen
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was WWB.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
order date, product, and what was tested.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Yeah, HJ took 17 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was KP.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
the VendorInvestigate result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Cosigning the evidence standard.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 75 weeks to accept.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
the reship rate on QSC is actually pretty consistent
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
- 1independent test or vendor COA, which is it11 comments in this branch · started by u/dagny_ogunleye
- 2Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.9 comments in this branch · started by u/paper_trail_paula