GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part — 44 comments in the full submission. View in context.
13k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/patient_labslip_log

[Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 15 comments

Week 55 update. 46kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 95. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness. The part that surprised me is how much of this is…

Read the full submission and all 44 comments →

This branch

15 comments, started 2 years ago
u/patient_labslip_log238 points·2 years ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/freya_onwuka129 points·2 years ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitru100 points·2 years ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_lokken76 points·2 years ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink
u/patient_labslip_logOP-11 points·2 years ago

Cosigning the evidence standard.

Adding to this: testing is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/patient_labslip_logOP1 point·2 years ago

the reship rate on TFC is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink
u/patient_labslip_logOP69 points·2 years ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/ireland_drugs_pay267 points·2 years ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida171 points·2 years ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adnan_karlsen124 points·2 years ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen44 points·2 years ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard94 points·2 years ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/reads_the_wiki137 points·2 years ago

Not to be pedantic but vendor and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_eriksen70 points·2 years ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]100 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.