174
[Regain] appetite came back over five weeks, here is the timeline
Quick one. Canada here. discontinuation works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given…
u/patient_labslip_log
I post rarely and I check my numbers twice.
newer member · joined 24 Mar 2024
20,853post karma
4,287comment karma
10submissions
92comments
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 7 points · 9 days ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Question] how do you verify identity when there is no reference standard in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 9 days ago
Strongly agree. Evidence level matters.
comment on [Vendor] BCH sent the wrong compound and fixed it in 48 hours in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 12 days ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
comment on [Regain] appetite came back over five weeks, here is the timeline in c/tapering · 12 points · 12 days ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on [Regain] appetite came back over five weeks, here is the timeline in c/tapering · 21 points · 12 days ago
say how long you were on and at what dose before taper
comment on [Meta] the research peptides rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · -5 points · 1 months ago
supply-chain naming is a mess, ask for HPLC
comment on [Meta] the research peptides rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 4 points · 1 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with thymosin, not with what you concluded.
590
[Meta] the research peptides rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
I have had 4 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
comment on i keep a spreadsheet of every vendor claim and whether it survived contact with a lab in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 1 months ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring EMA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 1 months ago
the 4-country variation is the whole point
comment on group buy organiser vanished with 3.4k. here is the timeline in c/vendorvetting · 74 points · 1 months ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on group buy organiser vanished with 3.4k. here is the timeline in c/vendorvetting · -8 points · 1 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on group buy organiser vanished with 3.4k. here is the timeline in c/vendorvetting · 78 points · 1 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 23 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1eu · -36 points · 1 months ago
apotheke, receta, Apotheke — twenty-seven different answers
2.2k
group buy organiser vanished with 3.4k. here is the timeline
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/maintenancephase repeats that order records is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and…
comment on glucagon is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/survodutide · 31 points · 1 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on genuine question about biopsy that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 4 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
comment on prescription: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1eu · 9 points · 2 months ago
Which country? Rules differ.
comment on am I the only one who found order records harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 65 points · 2 months ago
Water content matters more than people think.
Adding to this: vendor is doing more work than the comment implies.