switched from 15mg to 12.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 12.5mg, week 38, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 7 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
the reship rate on CPC is actually pretty consistent
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the reship rate on BCH is actually pretty consistent
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not to be pedantic but Janoshik and order records are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
no
Adding to this: PeptideMeter is doing more work than the comment implies.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
no
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 58 weeks to accept.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
no Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 58 weeks to accept.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Tested 10 batches from Homopeptide over 8 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.
- 1The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after…8 comments in this branch · started by u/lina_falk
- 2no8 comments in this branch · started by u/soren_zamora