5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 10mg, week 3, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 3 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
How many orders from GL Biochem is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
Cosigning the evidence standard.
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
KP took 18 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with order records, not with what you concluded.
Is that a VendorInvestigate result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
SWB order #3, the UK, no drama, receipts inside
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the batch number or it did not happen
Not to be pedantic but testing and reship are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Not to be pedantic but testing and reship are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
- 1You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.8 comments in this branch · started by u/laila_almeida
- 2Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.4 comments in this branch · started by u/signe_villalobos