[Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on testing
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: vendor matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 24 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 5 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
First order from TFC was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
SWB order #11, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 37 weeks to accept.
First order from ERP was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
This order history matches mine almost exactly.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
GGPeps took 6 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
- 1First order from TFC was great, second one had a different batch and tested…5 comments in this branch · started by u/bastian_aalto