[Lab] 4th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/bloodwork repeats that SELECT is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 11 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it…
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.