GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 51 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.7k
c/trialwatch·submitted 1 year ago by u/yannick_salinas

three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Trial Databranch of 9 comments

Been lurking in c/glp1muscle for about 13 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 95, 12.5mg, and SELECT is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 3 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…

Read the full submission and all 51 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/aurel_mwangi488 points·1 year ago

This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.

replysharereportpermalink
u/week_four_wall305 points·1 year ago·edited

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_salinasOP-33 points·1 year ago

SELECT reported a TRIUMPH hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_dahlberg1 point·1 year ago

This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.

replysharereportpermalink
u/forest_plot_fionastats1 point·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]203 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/heart_rate_bump53 points·1 year ago

Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_salinas116 points·1 year ago

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_ilunga100 points·1 year ago

Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.