GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 51 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 52 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.4k
c/t2dglp1·submitted 3 months ago by u/wanjiru_osei

[Results] 51 weeks on 2.4mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Resultsbranch of 12 comments

Quick one. Canada here. CGM works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 17 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost.…

Read the full submission and all 52 comments →

This branch

12 comments, started 3 months ago
u/fasting_insulin_fMOD214 points·3 months ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_mwangi72 points·3 months ago

Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_ostergaard23 points·3 months ago

Strongly agree.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 14 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/not_my_main_nm0 points·3 months ago

Strongly agree.

Adding to this: metformin is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/protein_first_pnutrition170 points·3 months ago·edited

Came off after 11 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_oseiOP110 points·3 months ago·edited

Maintenance for 4 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.

replysharereportpermalink
u/karim_ramos37 points·3 months ago

A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin

replysharereportpermalink
u/sigrid_kaufmann51 points·3 months ago

Came off after 87 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_castellanos162 points·3 months ago

Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.

replysharereportpermalink
u/amylin_amyamylin99 points·3 months ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meal_prep_mira28 points·3 months ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani37 points·3 months ago

the 9 A1c trend is the answer

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/t2dglp1

Type 2 diabetes as the original indication: A1c trajectories, CGM traces, hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with sulfonylureas or insulin, metformin combinations, and why the weight-loss conversation sometimes drowns out the glycaemic one.

36kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/t2dglp1 rules
  1. Insulin and sulfonylurea interactions are a real hypo risk. Do not hand-wave them.
  2. Post A1c with units and the assay date.
  3. No medication-stopping advice. Ever.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.