GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of retatrutide vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more — 65 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.8k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 months ago by u/emil_agyeman

retatrutide vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more

Trial Databranch of 11 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking retatrutide against triglycerides for 35 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one…

Read the full submission and all 65 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 2 months ago
u/honest_syringe33260 points·2 months ago
n=1 but same
replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theotrial nerd201 points·2 months ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

replysharereportpermalink
u/nordic_pricing45 points·1 months ago

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 70 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]17 points·1 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/lurker_for_years86 points·1 months ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyemanOP60 points·1 months ago

Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_ivaturi136 points·1 months ago

This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/deleted_my_history90 points·1 months ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_cardoso61 points·1 months ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain21 points·1 months ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pam17 points·1 months ago·edited

triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.