[Question] how do you actually verify triple agonist
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on TRIUMPH in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Which trial arm and what was the n?
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
Which trial arm and what was the n?
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
Adding to this: triple agonist is doing more work than the comment implies.
- 1Which trial arm and what was the n?7 comments in this branch · started by u/divya_bakken