u/farid_molnar
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Salvador.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 166 points · 12 days ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 36 points · 1 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice in c/retatrutide · 69 points · 3 months ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on [Question] dose escalation — what am I missing here in c/retatrutide · 11 points · 4 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on [Question] dose escalation — what am I missing here in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 4 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · -28 points · 4 months ago
The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The early fullness are not just amplified versions.
comment on [Lab] 14th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 32 points · 5 months ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on [Lab] 14th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 5 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on why does nobody talk about triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 62 points · 5 months ago
the 12.5mg arm is different from 10mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Lab] 16th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 154 points · 6 months ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
comment on [Lab] 16th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 368 points · 6 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 5 in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 6 months ago
the 7.5mg arm is different from 10mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about glucagon until somebody posts a number in c/retatrutide · 689 points · 6 months ago
the 2.5mg arm is different from 1.0mg, results do not transfer
comment on week 26 check-in — 42kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 84 points · 7 months ago
the dosing is steep, the injection-site soreness reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on am I the only one who found TRIUMPH harder than the injections in c/retatrutide · 47 points · 8 months ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on am I the only one who found triple agonist harder than the injections in c/retatrutide · 5 points · 9 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.9.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on am I the only one who found triple agonist harder than the injections in c/retatrutide · -18 points · 9 months ago
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 90 in c/retatrutide · 242 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on the TRIUMPH thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 10 months ago
the dosing is steep, the sulphur burps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on the TRIUMPH thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 399 points · 10 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.