what would you tell week-1 you about handling
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 8 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have early fullness I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 24 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Second this question. I have wondered about thymosin for 9 months and never seen a straight answer.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with identity, not with what you concluded.
Sweden here. Waited 3 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
What was the batch number and which service?
not approved for human use, full stop
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, secretagogue, long tail
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
name the compound precisely, TB-500 and Thymosin Beta-4 are not the same
Did anything else change in the same window?
Yeah, identity is the first question.
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
not approved for human use, full stop
research use only, handling and analysis, not administration
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, identity, long tail
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
everything else in the vial drawer, secretagogue
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 99.2% on the same vial is normal.
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, secretagogue, long tail
- 1Sweden here. Waited 3 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total…7 comments in this branch · started by u/osman_ferrari
- 2The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.7 comments in this branch · started by u/gustav_solberg