u/erez_yilmaz
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Basel.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
comment on [Trial Data] ATTAIN-1 numbers, and why the % is not the headline in c/orforglipron · 17 points · 3 days ago
small molecule, not a peptide, purity discussion is different
comment on [Trial Data] ATTAIN-1 numbers, and why the % is not the headline in c/orforglipron · 22 points · 3 days ago
oral non-peptide agonist is orforglipron, no food restrictions
comment on [Country Guide] personal import rules, my country, with the actual citations in c/customs · -29 points · 3 days ago
This is correct. State your country always.
comment on [Correction] you cannot report area% to two decimals off that baseline in c/hplc · 2 points · 6 days ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 16 points · 10 days ago
Apotheke or receta or what?
comment on [Data] BIA vs DEXA on the same day, 6% apart, pick a method and stay with it in c/glp1muscle · 9 points · 11 days ago
Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on jurisdiction in c/customs · 6 points · 24 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on genuine question about protein that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 27 days ago
Not to be pedantic but resistance training and protein are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring personal import at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 1 points · 29 days ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 93.7% on the same vial is normal.
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 5 points · 1 months ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
comment on anyone else notice research peptides kicking in around week 9 in c/researchpeptides · 11 points · 1 months ago
not approved for human use, full stop
comment on [Meta] the research peptides rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 24 points · 1 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1eu · 7 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for FFMI posts in c/glp1muscle · 16 points · 1 months ago
Came off after 90 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on unpopular opinion: method development is massively overrated in c/hplc · 4 points · 2 months ago
the detector wavelength matters more than people think
comment on [PSA] non-peptide is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 2 months ago
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
comment on non-peptide: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/orforglipron · 24 points · 2 months ago
oral non-peptide agonist is ACHIEVE, no food restrictions
comment on integration vs purity — genuinely asking which matters more in c/hplc · 4 points · 3 months ago
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
Adding to this: method development is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about LC-MS in c/hplc · 20 points · 3 months ago
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
comment on jurisdiction: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/customs · 37 points · 3 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.