stalled for 11 weeks at 2.5mg and I refuse to panic this time
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/sideeffects repeats that non-peptide is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 23 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically
the non-peptide is whether this actually works long-term
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.