batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more
Right, the below spec question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 11 data points over 20 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 74, not week 28. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
HJ product, PeptideMeter test, 98.3% result, batch 17, 38 days in transit. Logged.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
inter-lab variance is real, 6 points is inside normal
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Tested 4 batches from SWB over 8 weeks. Spread was 98.4% to 97.2, mostly 98.4. Consistent vendor.
Not to be pedantic but batch and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
the 96.8% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Medutest, not with what you concluded.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 13 points, both inside inter-lab variance
HJ / BPC / batch 4 / VendorInvestigate / 99.0% — that is the shape
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
TFC product, Janoshik test, 97.6% result, batch 19, 6 days in transit. Logged.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
MKM / BPC / batch 9 / PeptideMeter / 96.2% — that is the shape
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
MKM product, Medutest test, 97.4% result, batch 4, 31 days in transit. Logged.
- 1HJ product, PeptideMeter test, 98.3% result, batch 17, 38 days in transit.…7 comments in this branch · started by u/milan_villalobos
- 2You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.7 comments in this branch · started by u/camila_mensa