[PSA] batch is not what most of this community thinks it is
Right, the test results question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 17 data points over 6 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 22, not week 71. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
GGPeps product, VendorInvestigate test, 99.0% result, batch 10, 28 days in transit. Logged.
the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
My PeptideMeter result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. FGP deserves that note in the directory.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
- 1below-spec results get logged, not dismissed6 comments in this branch · started by u/mod_ambulatory
- 2do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the…4 comments in this branch · started by u/usp_appendix