GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
Locked. A moderator closed replies on this one. It stays up because the content above the argument is worth keeping.
2k
c/labresults·posted 1 year ago by u/jarno_cabrera

is it normal to get early fullness at week 20

Medutest Well Actually ×6 Clean Column ×1

Week 31 update. 37kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 83.

Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.

The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.

Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.

2,260 up / 265 down90% upvoted54 commentsid 1qr27t1 Apr 2025

54 comments

22 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/kenji_demir156 points·1 year ago

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren72 points·1 year ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen130 points·1 year ago

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

replysharereportpermalink
u/due_diligence_dee92 points·1 year ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer50 points·1 year ago

the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 11 points, both inside inter-lab variance

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]34 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitorMOD57 points·1 year ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida39 points·1 year ago·edited

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi23 points·1 year ago

the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 16 points, both inside inter-lab variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros12 points·1 year ago

TFC / BPC / batch 17 / VendorInvestigate / 97.9% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi14 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabreraOP17 points·1 year ago

the 98.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca35 points·1 year ago·edited

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts-22 points·1 year ago

The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reship_roulette1 point·1 year ago

Small correction: the trial was 4 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_mel1 point·1 year ago·edited

Small correction: the trial was 18 weeks, not 17. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca1 point·1 year ago

Small correction: the trial was 18 weeks, not 17.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 78 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen1 point·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/britta_boateng0 points·1 year ago

multiple batches from SGN show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_bergstrom1 point·1 year ago·edited

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_vermeulen0 points·1 year ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Medutest, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wanda11 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.