GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of is it normal to get early fullness at week 20 — 54 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/jarno_cabrera

is it normal to get early fullness at week 20

Medutestbranch of 6 comments

Week 31 update. 37kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 83. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness. The part that surprised me is how much of this is…

Read the full submission and all 54 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/coa_janitorMOD57 points·1 year ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_almeida39 points·1 year ago·edited

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi23 points·1 year ago

the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 16 points, both inside inter-lab variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros12 points·1 year ago

TFC / BPC / batch 17 / VendorInvestigate / 97.9% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_mwangi14 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabreraOP17 points·1 year ago

the 98.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →