GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
2.2k
c/labresults·posted 2 years ago by u/rina_sobczak

[Vendor] QST order #9 — Canada, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside

Discussion Long Haul ×2 Slow Clap ×1

Right, the Janoshik question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 9 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 90, not week 44. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

2,580 up / 422 down86% upvoted31 commentsid 1qgkn02 Oct 2023

31 comments

19 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/nadia_trevino294 points·2 years ago

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_kowalski121 points·2 years ago

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.1% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_moreau34 points·2 years ago

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts Disagree on that part.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 53 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_mel144 points·2 years ago

Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →
u/noor_vermeulen-4 points·2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_sobczakOP1 point·2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_sobczakOP1 point·2 years ago

Batch number? Date of test?

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_sobczakOP0 points·2 years ago

BCH / BPC / batch 5 / Medutest / 98.7% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/ffmi_watcher112 points·2 years ago
batch number?
replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyeman162 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_chowdhury76 points·2 years ago

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 9–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thandi_solberg91 points·2 years ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_kimani107 points·2 years ago

Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_mensah35 points·2 years ago

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 9–5.

Disagree on that part. 94.2% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_kirchner51 points·2 years ago

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchner34 points·2 years ago·edited

Batch number? Date of test?

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.