21 months in and pharmacology is still the thing I get wrong
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/meta repeats that half-life is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 10 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it…
Is that mechanism or speculation?
receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere
receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere
Adding to this: pharmacology is doing more work than the comment implies.
the half-life is half-life, affects steady state timing
central appetite signalling is real but people overweight it
mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation
Is that mechanism or speculation?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
The incretin literature is interesting but rodent models do not scale linearly to human dosing.
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected