GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of tried incretin for 21 weeks. here is what happened. — 13 comments in the full submission. View in context.
264
c/glp1science·submitted 4 months ago by u/split_dose_sceptic

tried incretin for 21 weeks. here is what happened.

Needs Sourcebranch of 6 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking receptor against triglycerides for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab,…

Read the full submission and all 13 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 4 months ago
u/enzo_petrescu31 points·4 months ago

Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterappeals24 points·4 months ago

Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_lokken11 points·4 months ago

Which paper are you quoting?

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_guerrero10 points·4 months ago

do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_ramos10 points·4 months ago

receptor distribution matters, GLP-1 is not everywhere

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_hovland7 points·4 months ago

This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1science

The mechanism layer: incretin physiology, receptor distribution, gastric emptying, central appetite signalling, glucagon-receptor contribution, amylin co-agonism, and the pharmacokinetics that make weekly dosing possible. Papers get cited by journal and year or they get a [needs source] reply.

50kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/glp1science rules
  1. Cite the paper: journal, year, first author. Links optional, citation mandatory.
  2. Mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation.
  3. No extrapolating rodent data to human dosing without saying that is what you are doing.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.